A Comparison of the Allport and Feagin Scoring Procedures for Intrinsic/Extrinsic Religious Orientation
Two different scoring techniques published by Feagin and by Allport for a common pool of 21 intrinsic/extrinsic religious orientation scale items developed by persons at Harvard are compared. Correlations between both Feagin's and Allport's total scales, their sub-scales, and a measure of...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[1971]
|
| Dans: |
Journal for the scientific study of religion
Année: 1971, Volume: 10, Numéro: 4, Pages: 370-374 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Religious experience philosophy
B Religious prejudice B Psychometrics |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | Two different scoring techniques published by Feagin and by Allport for a common pool of 21 intrinsic/extrinsic religious orientation scale items developed by persons at Harvard are compared. Correlations between both Feagin's and Allport's total scales, their sub-scales, and a measure of reported religious experience (REEM) are reported. It is concluded that Feagin's scoring technique is as adequate as is Allport's and that neither Feagin's nor Allport's sub-scales can be combined to form a single, unidimensional scale. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1468-5906 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/1384783 |