Conflicting Process Theodicies
This article examines the process theodicies of David Ray Griffin and Philip Clayton. It explains their differences on such issues as God's primordial power and voluntary self-limitation, creativity as an independent metaphysical principle that limits God, creation out of nothing or out of chao...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
University of Illinois Press
[2019]
|
| In: |
Process studies
Jahr: 2019, Band: 48, Heft: 1, Seiten: 19-39 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Griffin, David Ray 1939-
/ Clayton, Philip 1956-
/ Prozesstheologie
/ Theodizee
/ Gott
/ Schöpfung
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus NBC Gotteslehre NBD Schöpfungslehre |
| Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article examines the process theodicies of David Ray Griffin and Philip Clayton. It explains their differences on such issues as God's primordial power and voluntary self-limitation, creativity as an independent metaphysical principle that limits God, creation out of nothing or out of chaos, and God's voluntary causal naturalism. Difficulties with their positions are discussed. The Clayton-Knapp "no-not-once" principle is explained, and a more comprehensive theodicy is outlined. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2154-3682 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Process studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/process20194813 |