Conflicting Process Theodicies
This article examines the process theodicies of David Ray Griffin and Philip Clayton. It explains their differences on such issues as God's primordial power and voluntary self-limitation, creativity as an independent metaphysical principle that limits God, creation out of nothing or out of chao...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
University of Illinois Press
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Process studies
Année: 2019, Volume: 48, Numéro: 1, Pages: 19-39 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Griffin, David Ray 1939-
/ Clayton, Philip 1956-
/ Théologie du process
/ Théodicée
/ Dieu
/ Création
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu NBD Création |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | This article examines the process theodicies of David Ray Griffin and Philip Clayton. It explains their differences on such issues as God's primordial power and voluntary self-limitation, creativity as an independent metaphysical principle that limits God, creation out of nothing or out of chaos, and God's voluntary causal naturalism. Difficulties with their positions are discussed. The Clayton-Knapp "no-not-once" principle is explained, and a more comprehensive theodicy is outlined. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2154-3682 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Process studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/process20194813 |