A Response to Sollereder and Allen
In this brief response to the papers of Sollereder and Allen in this issue, Southgate considers the state of the debate on evolutionary theodicy, and specifically the source of the disvalues in creation. He responds to Allen's Augustinian suggestions by reference to a recent article on Augustin...
| Subtitles: | Engaging the Scholarship of Christopher Southgate |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
[2019]
|
| In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2019, Volume: 17, Issue: 2, Pages: 180-184 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God NBD Doctrine of Creation NBE Anthropology |
| Further subjects: | B
Augustine
B Theodicy B Evolution B Trauma |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Summary: | In this brief response to the papers of Sollereder and Allen in this issue, Southgate considers the state of the debate on evolutionary theodicy, and specifically the source of the disvalues in creation. He responds to Allen's Augustinian suggestions by reference to a recent article on Augustine and theodicy by Stan Rosenberg. He ends by reflecting on the journey in his own thinking in relation to suffering. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Creation, Redemption and Theodicy in the Work of Christopher Southgate (2019)"
Kritik von "Christopher Southgate on Glory and Compassion (2019)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2019.1596248 |