The Pragmatist Question of Sovereignty

In Democracy and Tradition, Jeffrey Stout asks Christian political theologians if they can discern God's activity in modern democratic cultures. In so doing they might "acknowledge the sovereignty of God while transcending both resentment of, and absorption into, the secular." As Stou...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Stanley, Timothy 1976- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group [2019]
Dans: Political theology
Année: 2019, Volume: 20, Numéro: 2, Pages: 139-156
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Stout, Jeffrey 1950- / Scholem, Gershom 1897-1982 / Quṭb, Saiyid 1906-1966 / Dieu / Domination / Pragmatisme
RelBib Classification:AD Sociologie des religions
BH Judaïsme
BJ Islam
CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses
CG Christianisme et politique
NBC Dieu
Sujets non-standardisés:B Comparative Theology
B Karl Barth
B Jeffrey Stout
B Pragmatism
B Sayyid Qutb
B Gershom Scholem
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:In Democracy and Tradition, Jeffrey Stout asks Christian political theologians if they can discern God's activity in modern democratic cultures. In so doing they might "acknowledge the sovereignty of God while transcending both resentment of, and absorption into, the secular." As Stout recognizes, the question of sovereignty is relevant not only to Christian, but also Jewish and Islamic thought. However, interreligious comparisons remain undeveloped in his work. In response, the following essay coordinates Stout's pragmatism with developments in comparative theology. It then evaluates both the Jewish messianism of Gershom Scholem alongside Islamic sovereignty (hakimayyah) in the thought of Sayyid Qutb. While their viewpoints differ in considerable respects, they nonetheless provide key test cases for Stout's questions concerning divine sovereignty. In sum, the paper opens new avenues for religious deliberations in democratic traditions.
ISSN:1743-1719
Contient:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2018.1559006