The Pragmatist Question of Sovereignty
In Democracy and Tradition, Jeffrey Stout asks Christian political theologians if they can discern God's activity in modern democratic cultures. In so doing they might "acknowledge the sovereignty of God while transcending both resentment of, and absorption into, the secular." As Stou...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2019]
|
Dans: |
Political theology
Année: 2019, Volume: 20, Numéro: 2, Pages: 139-156 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Stout, Jeffrey 1950-
/ Scholem, Gershom 1897-1982
/ Quṭb, Saiyid 1906-1966
/ Dieu
/ Domination
/ Pragmatisme
|
RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions BH Judaïsme BJ Islam CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses CG Christianisme et politique NBC Dieu |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Comparative Theology
B Karl Barth B Jeffrey Stout B Pragmatism B Sayyid Qutb B Gershom Scholem |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Résumé: | In Democracy and Tradition, Jeffrey Stout asks Christian political theologians if they can discern God's activity in modern democratic cultures. In so doing they might "acknowledge the sovereignty of God while transcending both resentment of, and absorption into, the secular." As Stout recognizes, the question of sovereignty is relevant not only to Christian, but also Jewish and Islamic thought. However, interreligious comparisons remain undeveloped in his work. In response, the following essay coordinates Stout's pragmatism with developments in comparative theology. It then evaluates both the Jewish messianism of Gershom Scholem alongside Islamic sovereignty (hakimayyah) in the thought of Sayyid Qutb. While their viewpoints differ in considerable respects, they nonetheless provide key test cases for Stout's questions concerning divine sovereignty. In sum, the paper opens new avenues for religious deliberations in democratic traditions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1743-1719 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Political theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2018.1559006 |