Morality and mortality: why the Church of England would have rejected Walzer's supreme emergency argument
Walzer insists that his supreme emergency argument morally legitimises Churchill's 1940 decision to bomb German civilians. We contend, however, that it is morally deficient. We contend, further, that if Walzer's argument had been presented to the leaders of the Church of England in 1940 as...
| Publié dans: | Journal of beliefs and values |
|---|---|
| Auteurs: | ; |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
[2018]
|
| Dans: |
Journal of beliefs and values
Année: 2018, Volume: 39, Numéro: 4, Pages: 490-501 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Walzer, Michael 1935-
/ Church of England
/ Éthique chrétienne
/ Éthique
/ Laïcité
|
| RelBib Classification: | KDE Église anglicane NCC Éthique sociale |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Ethics
B Rights B Walzer B Church of England B supreme emergency |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |