Motivating the Search for Alternatives to Personal OmniGod Theism: The Case from Classical Theism
Analytic philosophers of religion typically take God to be 'the personal omniGod' - a (supernatural, immaterial) person who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, and who creates and sustains all else that exists. Analytic philosophers also tend to assume that the personal omniGod i...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2018]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2018, Volume: 10, Issue: 4, Pages: 97-118 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Theism
/ God
/ Omnipotence
/ Religious philosophy
/ Alternative
|
| RelBib Classification: | NBC Doctrine of God |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (KW) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Analytic philosophers of religion typically take God to be 'the personal omniGod' - a (supernatural, immaterial) person who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, and who creates and sustains all else that exists. Analytic philosophers also tend to assume that the personal omniGod is the God of 'classical' theism. Arguably, this is a mistake. To be consistent, a classical theist or her supporter must deny that God is literally a person. They need not, however, deny the aptness of using personal language, or of thinking of God as a person or personal at the level of religious psychology. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v10i4.2622 |