Kan magten fornuftbestemme religionen?
Resumé This review presents a short introduction to the main problem addressed in Lars Albinus’ doctoral thesis Religion, Power and Communication ensued by a critical discussion of the following three central issues at stake in the thesis. First, the thesis’ ambitious attempt to produce a dialectica...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | Danish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Anis
2011
|
| In: |
Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
Year: 2011, Volume: 74, Issue: 4, Pages: 319-324 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religion
/ The Modern
/ Secularization
B Foucault, Michel 1926-1984 / Power / Habermas, Jürgen 1929- / Communication |
| RelBib Classification: | NCC Social ethics VA Philosophy ZB Sociology |
| Further subjects: | B
Lars Albinus
B Modernity B Religion B Habermas B Secularisation B Communikation B Power B Foucault |
| Summary: | Resumé This review presents a short introduction to the main problem addressed in Lars Albinus’ doctoral thesis Religion, Power and Communication ensued by a critical discussion of the following three central issues at stake in the thesis. First, the thesis’ ambitious attempt to produce a dialectical reading of Foucault’s analytics of power and Habermas’s theory of communicative action is evaluated. Then, after a compressed outline of the solution that the thesis proposes to its main problem, this solution is discussed. And last, the notion of a post-metaphysical non-authoritative God indicated in the thesis is briefly considered. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0105-3191 |
| Contains: | In: Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
|