The missing jihad: why have there been no jihadist civil wars in Southeast Asia?

Why has there been no jihadist civil war in Southeast Asia? Although there has been a global surge in armed conflicts where at least one side fights for self-proclaimed Islamist aspirations, the region of Southeast Asia stands out by not having experienced a single jihadist civil war after 1975. Yet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserInnen: Finnbogason, Daniel (VerfasserIn) ; Svensson, Isak 1974- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch/Druck Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group January 2018
In: The Pacific review
Jahr: 2018, Band: 31, Heft: 1, Seiten: 96-115
weitere Schlagwörter:B Militanz
B Konfliktregelung
B Bürgerkrieg
B Friede
B Dschihadismus
B Ursache
B Terrorismus
B Südostasien
B Konflikt
B Bekämpfung
B Islam
B Stabilität
B Politischer Islam
Online Zugang: Volltext (doi)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Why has there been no jihadist civil war in Southeast Asia? Although there has been a global surge in armed conflicts where at least one side fights for self-proclaimed Islamist aspirations, the region of Southeast Asia stands out by not having experienced a single jihadist civil war after 1975. Yet, so far, there have been no systematic comparisons of the frequency and nature of the Islamist violence in Southeast Asia and the rest of the world. This study therefore contributes by exploring the empirical trajectories in the region and situating Southeast Asia to global developments, utilizing new and unique data on religiously defined armed conflicts 1975-2015. We find that whereas the number of people killed in Islamist violence has increased in the rest of the world, it has decreased in Southeast Asia. We argue that Southeast Asia has prevented outbreaks of jihadist civil wars, and contained and partially resolved ongoing Islamist conflicts before they have escalated, due to three interrelated factors: the lack of internationalization of Islamist conflicts in the region, the openness of political channels for voicing Islamist aspirations, and government repression. This article suggests insights from the region that can be valuable from a global perspective. (Pac Rev/GIGA)
ISSN:0951-2748
Enthält:Enthalten in: The Pacific review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2017.1325391