Desire's revelatory conflagration
Through a comparative reading of work by Georges Bataille, Lee Edelman, Guy Hocquenghem and Pseudo-Dionysius, this essay argues that they share an apophatic vision that informs a politics of negating refusal. It insists that a queer theology, and its accompanying political vision, must be critical w...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Numérique/imprimé Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Taylor & Francis
[2017]
|
Dans: |
Theology & sexuality
Année: 2017, Volume: 23, Numéro: 1/2, Pages: 48-66 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Bataille, Georges 1897-1962
/ Edelman, Lee 1953-
/ Hocquenghem, Guy 1946-1988
/ Dionysius Areopagita ca. 5./6. Jh.
/ Queer theology
/ Negative theology
|
RelBib Classification: | CB Spiritualité chrétienne FD Théologie contextuelle NBE Anthropologie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
apophatic theology
B antagonism B Pseudo-dionysius B Georges Bataille B Lee Edelman B Guy Hocquenghem |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | Through a comparative reading of work by Georges Bataille, Lee Edelman, Guy Hocquenghem and Pseudo-Dionysius, this essay argues that they share an apophatic vision that informs a politics of negating refusal. It insists that a queer theology, and its accompanying political vision, must be critical without reserve, and only then can it avoid the antagonisms that comprise the social order. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1355-8358 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2017.1341206 |