You Show Me Yours, I’ll Show You Mine: Comparing Paradigms
The task of this article is to propose an alternative method for adjudicating truth claims between various paradigms. Informed by sources such as Augustine, Aquinas, Heidegger, Gadamer, and Kuhn, I argue for a form of reasoning which aspires to credibility, plausibility, and explanatory capacity, ra...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Numérique/imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Marquette Univ. Press
[2017]
|
| Dans: |
Philosophy & theology
Année: 2017, Volume: 29, Numéro: 1, Pages: 83-100 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Raison
/ Science
/ Vérité
/ Certitude
/ Plausibilité
/ Crédibilité
|
| RelBib Classification: | CF Christianisme et science VA Philosophie |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | The task of this article is to propose an alternative method for adjudicating truth claims between various paradigms. Informed by sources such as Augustine, Aquinas, Heidegger, Gadamer, and Kuhn, I argue for a form of reasoning which aspires to credibility, plausibility, and explanatory capacity, rather than absolute proof. Instead of representing a flight from scientific standards, I argue that such an approach ultimately represents the best hope of safeguarding the essence of science and rationality as such. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0890-2461 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Philosophy & theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/philtheol201611972 |