Naturalism, Normativity, and the Study of Religion
This article repudiates the common view that the study of religion, in order to qualify as academic, must be descriptively neutral and naturalistic rather than normative or prescriptive. Following philosophers like John McDowell, John Cottingham, and Tyler Roberts, I claim that such a methodological...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
MDPI
[2017]
|
| In: |
Religions
Jahr: 2017, Band: 8, Heft: 10, Seiten: 1-13 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Humanities
B Methodology B Religious Studies B Philosophy of religion B Naturalism B Interpretation B Normativity |
| Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1586247530 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190117090842.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190115s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel8100220 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1586247530 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)516247530 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ516247530 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1044274204 |0 (DE-627)771725655 |0 (DE-576)396770592 |4 aut |a Mundra, Anil | |
| 109 | |a Mundra, Anil | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Naturalism, Normativity, and the Study of Religion |c Anil Mundra |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article repudiates the common view that the study of religion, in order to qualify as academic, must be descriptively neutral and naturalistic rather than normative or prescriptive. Following philosophers like John McDowell, John Cottingham, and Tyler Roberts, I claim that such a methodological stance amounts to viewing humans as determined rather than free agents. On the basis of W.V.O. Quine and Donald Davidson's analysis of translation, I argue that normativity is ineliminable from humanistic scholarship, which is itself inextricable from religious studies. Robert Pippin and Thomas A. Lewis's readings of Hegel then provide resources to reconcile human freedom and constraint in religion. | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Humanities | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Interpretation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Methodology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Naturalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Normativity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Studies | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 8(2017), 10, Seite 1-13 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2017 |g number:10 |g pages:1-13 |
| 856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/10/220/pdf?version=1507776578 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/10/220 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8100220 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 8 |j 2017 |e 10 |h 1-13 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3045575722 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1586247530 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190115153724 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Interpretation of,Interpretation |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Interprétation |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Interpretación |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Interpretazione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 阐明,解释 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 闡明,解釋 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Interpretação |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Интерпретация |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ερμηνεία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||