Revealing What’s Implicit
This article reinterprets Maimonides’ theory of creation and revelation by focusing upon the relationship between belief in creation and the affirmation of miracle and law described in Guide II:25. Focusing upon Maimonides’ use of inference to describe creation and revelation, I re-evaluate Maimonid...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2018
|
| Dans: |
The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
Année: 2018, Volume: 26, Numéro: 1, Pages: 1-33 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Creation
inferential reasoning
law
Maimonides
naturalism
normativity
philosophy
prophecy
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | This article reinterprets Maimonides’ theory of creation and revelation by focusing upon the relationship between belief in creation and the affirmation of miracle and law described in Guide II:25. Focusing upon Maimonides’ use of inference to describe creation and revelation, I re-evaluate Maimonides’ account as an instance of inferential reasoning. That is, Maimonides makes use of, rather than proves, the implicit norms of creation and revelation in their explicit function of legal reasoning. Thus, I suggest that Maimonides’ emphasis upon inferential judgment in justifying law is a defense of creation and revelation as rules of reasoning. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-285X |
| Contient: | In: The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341299 |