The System Isn't Broken. It's Fixed
This paper has two distinct and related aims. First, I attempt to clarify the oft-made claim that somehow the system is fixed. What is meant by that charge and how is it distinct from other kinds of complaints with regard to economic inequality? Second, I attempt to show how important it is to und...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
MDPI
[2017]
|
| Dans: |
Religions
Année: 2017, Volume: 8, Numéro: 4, Pages: 1-6 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
equality of opportunity
B John Rawls B equality of outcome B Egalitarianism B Elizabeth Anderson B joint cooperative activity |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | This paper has two distinct and related aims. First, I attempt to clarify the oft-made claim that somehow the system is fixed. What is meant by that charge and how is it distinct from other kinds of complaints with regard to economic inequality? Second, I attempt to show how important it is to understand what we are doing together as members of a (political) economy. Without a clear conception of our joint, collaborative active, it is difficult to have a fruitful discussion of economic justice. Throughout the paper, I borrow insights from the philosopher Elizabeth Anderson. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2077-1444 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religions
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3390/rel8040057 |