The early history of religion (dis)proving its truth

The first Church father writing in Arabic, Theodore Abu Qurrah, and the first Muslim author to compose a systematic refutation of Christianity, ʿAbd al-Jabbar, both apply the historical argument in order to prove or refute the truth of Christianity. Both agree that the first followers of a religion...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Seppälä, Serafim 1970- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: [publisher not identified] [2018]
Dans: Approaching religion
Année: 2018, Volume: 8, Numéro: 2, Pages: 27-39
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Theodor Abū-Qurra 750-823 / ʿAbd-al-Ǧabbār Ibn-Aḥmad 936-1025 / Christianisme / Vérité / Preuve / Islam
RelBib Classification:AX Dialogue interreligieux
BJ Islam
KAB Christianisme primitif
Sujets non-standardisés:B Arabic
B Islam
B Christianity
B Polemics
B Apologetics
B History
B historical argument
Accès en ligne: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:The first Church father writing in Arabic, Theodore Abu Qurrah, and the first Muslim author to compose a systematic refutation of Christianity, ʿAbd al-Jabbar, both apply the historical argument in order to prove or refute the truth of Christianity. Both agree that the first followers of a religion represent an ideal way of following their religion. Abu Qurrah argued that Christianity is the true religion because its first followers were persecuted, poor and non-violent; ʿAbd al-Jabbar argued to prove that Islam is the true religion because its first followers had the divine authority to conquer and plunder. However, he had to reconstruct the history of early Christendom thoroughly to prove that it is a violent, immoral and thus a false religion. At times, Abū Qurrah and ʿAbd al-Jabbār look at the same facts from opposing perspectives; at times, they appear to have a similar perspective, but to be looking at different facts.
ISSN:1799-3121
Contient:Enthalten in: Approaching religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.30664/ar.69756