Content and Form: Authorship Attribution and Pseudonymity in Ancient Speeches, Letters, Lectures, and Translations. A joinder to Bart Ehrman
The ancient notion of authorship and forgery can be analyzed in various ancient texts, including embedded texts (e.g., reported speeches) and independent texts, some written under the author's control (e.g., speeches, letters, and history books), as well as others written independently of the a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Scholar's Press
[2017]
|
| In: |
Journal of Biblical literature
Year: 2017, Volume: 136, Issue: 2, Pages: 381-403 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Ehrman, Bart D. 1955-, Forgery and counterforgery
/ Classical antiquity
/ Literature
/ Authorship
/ Pseudonym
/ Pseudepigraphy
/ Literary forgery
|
| RelBib Classification: | TB Antiquity TK Recent history |
| Further subjects: | B
AUTHORS & readers
B Authorship B LOTKA'S law (Bibliometrics) B FORGERY of letters B UNPUBLISHED materials |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1581506244 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211104095754.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 181002s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.15699/jbl.1362.2017.200369 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1581506244 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)511506244 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ511506244 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)123258197 |0 (DE-627)082444560 |0 (DE-576)293625476 |4 aut |a Baum, Armin Daniel |d 1965- | |
| 109 | |a Baum, Armin Daniel 1965- |a Baum, Armin D. 1965- |a Baum, Armin 1965- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Content and Form |b Authorship Attribution and Pseudonymity in Ancient Speeches, Letters, Lectures, and Translations. A joinder to Bart Ehrman |c Armin D. Baum |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The ancient notion of authorship and forgery can be analyzed in various ancient texts, including embedded texts (e.g., reported speeches) and independent texts, some written under the author's control (e.g., speeches, letters, and history books), as well as others written independently of the author's control (e.g., translations and unauthorized lecture publications). In all cases an authorial attribution was regarded as correct and nondeceptive if either content and wording or just the content of a particular text could be traced back to the author whose name it carried. This prevailing principle of ancient authorship attribution, while often taken for granted and applied without further explanation, was also stated explicitly in several places. These ancient statements are in conflict with the most innovative contribution of Bart Ehrman's otherwise very useful recent book Forgery and Counterforgery (2012). Ehrman has rightly joined the growing number of scholars who have raised substantive doubts regarding the once-popular thesis of innocent ancient pseudepigraphy. At the same time, his assertion that in antiquity a text's authenticity was assessed not on the basis of its content but always on the basis of its wording goes one step beyond what the numerous relevant ancient sources reveal. | ||
| 601 | |a Attribution | ||
| 601 | |a Translation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a AUTHORS & readers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Authorship | |
| 650 | 4 | |a FORGERY of letters | |
| 650 | 4 | |a LOTKA'S law (Bibliometrics) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a UNPUBLISHED materials | |
| 652 | |a TB:TK | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)1180442679 |0 (DE-627)1067726101 |0 (DE-576)520175417 |a Ehrman, Bart D. |2 gnd |d 1955- |t Forgery and counterforgery |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4068754-5 |0 (DE-627)106105086 |0 (DE-576)209174544 |2 gnd |a Antike |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4035964-5 |0 (DE-627)106245015 |0 (DE-576)209015608 |2 gnd |a Literatur |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4130545-0 |0 (DE-627)104623284 |0 (DE-576)209619902 |2 gnd |a Autorschaft |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4047653-4 |0 (DE-627)106193945 |0 (DE-576)209074272 |2 gnd |a Pseudonym |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4998210-2 |0 (DE-627)504486454 |0 (DE-576)25320321X |2 gnd |a Pseudepigraphie |
| 689 | 0 | 6 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4167842-4 |0 (DE-627)10542210X |0 (DE-576)209911573 |2 gnd |a Literarische Fälschung |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of Biblical literature |d Chico, Calif. : Scholar's Press, 1890 |g 136(2017), 2, Seite 381-403 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)34133832X |w (DE-600)2066536-2 |w (DE-576)121739872 |x 1934-3876 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:136 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:381-403 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1362.2017.200369 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a BIIN | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 136 |j 2017 |e 2 |h 381-403 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3027607499 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1581506244 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190306144655 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 181002||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053534 |a TB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053887 |a TK | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 399894608X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1581506244 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211103195558 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211103||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-1 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-1 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-1 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |m p |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 2 |b www / FTH Z4-421 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 85640 |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/permalink/f/1po5meu/UIB_alma51202048140003333 | ||
| LOK | |0 85640 |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/AC01202221 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a inzs | ||
| LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Authorship,Classical antiquity,Classical antiquity,Antiquity,Civilization, Greco-Roman,Civilization, Classical, in art,Civilization, Greco-Roman, in literature,Civilization, Ancient, in literature,Literary forgery,Literature,Literature,Belles-lettres,Pseudepigraphy,Pseudonym,Pseudonymity,Pseudepigraphy |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Antiquité,Antiquité,Attribution,Paternité d’une œuvre,Paternité d’une œuvre,Faux littéraire,Littérature,Littérature,Pseudonyme,Pseudépigraphie |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Antigüedad,Antigüedad,Autoría,Falsificación literaria,Literatura,Literatura,Pseudepigrafía,Pseudónimo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Antichità classica,Antichità classica,Falso letterario,Letteratura,Letteratura,Paternità letteraria,Pseudepigrafia,Pseudonimo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 作者身份,化名,假名,笔名,古典时代,古典时代,古典时期,古典时期,文学 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 作者身份,化名,假名,筆名,古典時代,古典時代,古典時期,古典時期,文學 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Antiguidade,Antiguidade,Autoria,Falsificação literária,Literatura,Literatura,Pseudepigrafia,Pseudônimo |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Авторство,Античность (мотив),Античность,Литература (мотив),Литература,Литературная подделка,Псевдоним,Псевдоэпиграфика |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αρχαιότητα (μοτίβο),Αρχαιότητα,Λογοτεχνία (μοτιβο),Λογοτεχνία,Λογοτεχνική πλαστογραφία,Συγγραφική πατρότητα,Ψευδεπιγραφία,Ψευδώνυμο |
| SUB | |a BIB |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Klassisches Altertum , Belletristik,Dichtung,Literarisches Kunstwerk,Schöne Literatur,Sprachkunst,Sprachliches Kunstwerk,Wortkunst,Belletristik,Dichtung,Schöne Literatur,Sprachkunst,Wortkunst , Verfasserschaft,Verfasserschaftsfrage,Verfasserfrage , Künstlername,Pseudonymität,Pseudonyme , Pseudepigrafie , Buchfälschung,Literatur |
| TIM | |a 099992000101_100005001231 |b Antike v800-500 | ||