Which Teacher Should I Choose?: A Xunzian Approach to Distinguishing Moral Experts from Fanatics
This essay examines whether an invocation of an epistemological privilege on the part of supposed moral experts prevents potential students from being able to evaluate among potential candidates for the role of plausible moral teacher. Throughout, it works to demonstrate that it is possible for even...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
| In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 45, Issue: 3, Pages: 463-480 |
| Further subjects: | B
moral experts
B moral teachers B Fanaticism B Confucianism B Virtue Ethics B Xunzi |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1580232892 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180821120816.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180821s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jore.12186 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1580232892 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)510232892 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ510232892 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1123238669 |0 (DE-627)876589581 |0 (DE-576)481693971 |4 aut |a Harris, Eirik Lang | |
| 109 | |a Harris, Eirik Lang |a Lang Harris, Eirik | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Which Teacher Should I Choose? |b A Xunzian Approach to Distinguishing Moral Experts from Fanatics |c Eirik Lang Harris |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This essay examines whether an invocation of an epistemological privilege on the part of supposed moral experts prevents potential students from being able to evaluate among potential candidates for the role of plausible moral teacher. Throughout, it works to demonstrate that it is possible for even the untutored student to distinguish between a fanatic and a moral expert. In particular, this essay focuses on the version of virtue ethics espoused by the early Chinese philosopher Xunzi. It argues that by reflecting on the attributes of fanatics, as well as on Xunzi's ideas and arguments about students and teachers, it is possible to arrive at a general set of principles that provide beginners with the tools necessary to distinguish dangerous fanatics from plausible moral teachers, even given the fact that both claim for themselves an epistemological privilege. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Confucianism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Xunzi | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fanaticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a moral experts | |
| 650 | 4 | |a moral teachers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Virtue Ethics | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 45(2017), 3, Seite 463-480 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:463-480 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12186 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12186 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 45 |j 2017 |e 3 |h 463-480 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3022863128 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1580232892 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180821104559 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180821||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||