Knowledge in the Historical Perspective of Coming-To-Be and Passing-Away

Since the last decades of the 20th century the meaning and content of knowledge has dramatically changed. This necessitates adopting a historical perspective in ap­proa­ching the questions of knowledge. But so far all the efforts of putting knowledge in a historical perspective since Hegel's hi...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Yildirim, Erdogan (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: CEEOL [2018]
Dans: Journal for the study of religions and ideologies
Année: 2018, Volume: 17, Numéro: 50, Pages: 3-16
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1770-1831, Die Phänomenologie des Geistes / Heidegger, Martin 1889-1976, Sein und Zeit / Aristoteles 384 avant J.-C.-322 avant J.-C., De vita et morte / Savoir
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
VB Herméneutique; philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B replacement of God
B Heidegger
B coming-to-be and passing-away
B Becoming
B poiein and paschein
B historical a priori
B Faith
B Spirit
B Knowledge
B Aristotle
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:Since the last decades of the 20th century the meaning and content of knowledge has dramatically changed. This necessitates adopting a historical perspective in ap­proa­ching the questions of knowledge. But so far all the efforts of putting knowledge in a historical perspective since Hegel's historization of Spirit either suffer from the limitations of the presupposition of the One (Spirit or Being) or fail to ground the historicity of knowledge on the history of coming-to-be and passing-away. Moving from Heidegger's ‘history of Being' toward the Aristotelian understanding of coming-to-be and passing away as a process of becoming has the potential to open up new avenues in approaching the historical question of knowledge as well as establishing its relation with the never com­plete ground (hypokeimenon) of the entities (ousia) as its historical a priori condition(s) of possibility.
ISSN:1583-0039
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of religions and ideologies