The Deconstruction of Religion: So What Next in the Debate?
The emergence of this special issue, from the maelstrom of responses1 to views on the Religious Studies Project website to the original post by Teemu Taira, "Categorising 'Religion': From Case Studies to Methodology"makes it clear that the various points of view around how we use...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Equinox
[2017]
|
| In: |
Implicit religion
Jahr: 2017, Band: 20, Heft: 4, Seiten: 385-396 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Religion
/ Kategorisierung
/ Dekonstruktion
|
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Deconstruction
B Argument B REASONING (Logic) B Religion B RESTATEMENTS of the law |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1578665280 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230831091939.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180814s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1558/imre.36139 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1578665280 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)508665280 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ508665280 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)122599640 |0 (DE-627)08204130X |0 (DE-576)293343365 |4 aut |a Hedges, Paul |d 1970- | |
| 109 | |a Hedges, Paul 1970- |a Hedges, Paul Michael 1970- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Deconstruction of Religion |b So What Next in the Debate? |c Paul Hedges |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The emergence of this special issue, from the maelstrom of responses1 to views on the Religious Studies Project website to the original post by Teemu Taira, "Categorising 'Religion': From Case Studies to Methodology"makes it clear that the various points of view around how we use the term and define "religion" generate a lot of heat, steam, and hot air. This in some ways is quite understandable, because at stake is not simply differing views on the nature and status of religion, but whole worldviews, conceptions of what the very study of religion is and should entail, and not to mention that very tricky subject: academic egos. This paper will be, primarily, a restatement of some of the core issues and arguments of my original response in the "So What" paper, 2 more or less repeating what was there. However, I will find it useful to expand a few points for clarity (the response was written to a very tight word count that meant some arguments were abbreviated), while I would also like to provide a new introduction and conclusion that locates this in relation to the various responses and the issues that came up. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Argument | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Deconstruction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a REASONING (Logic) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a RESTATEMENTS of the law | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049396-9 |0 (DE-627)106187155 |0 (DE-576)209081880 |2 gnd |a Religion |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4163445-7 |0 (DE-627)10545477X |0 (DE-576)209881070 |2 gnd |a Kategorisierung |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4149032-0 |0 (DE-627)105564281 |0 (DE-576)209769416 |2 gnd |a Dekonstruktion |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Implicit religion |d Sheffield : Equinox, 2004 |g 20(2017), 4, Seite 385-396 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)481278389 |w (DE-600)2179936-2 |w (DE-576)256442428 |x 1743-1697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g pages:385-396 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.36139 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 20 |j 2017 |e 4 |h 385-396 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3020959934 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1578665280 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180814103438 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180814||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Argument,Categorization,Deconstruction,Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Argument,Catégorisation,Déconstruction,Religion,Religions,Religion |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Argumento,Categorización,Deconstrucción,Religión,Religión,Religión |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Argomento,Categorizzazione,Decostruzione,Religione,Religione,Religione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 分类,分门别类,宗教,宗教,解构主义,解构理论,后结构主义 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 分類,分門別類,宗教,宗教,解構主義,解構理論,後結構主義,逻辑论证 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Argumento,Categorização,Desconstrução,Religião,Religião |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Аргумент,Деконструкция,Категоризация,Религия (мотив),Религия |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αποδόμηση,Επιχείρημα,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία,Κατηγοριοποίηση |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie |
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Deconstruction,Dekonstruktivismus |