On the Manuscripts of the Rituals for the Royal Couple CTH 416
Although certain similarities of KBo 17.2 with CTH 416 are undeniable, the theory that KBo 17.2 joins KBo 17.3+ (CTH 416.B) is problematic for a number of reasons. This study focuses first on the physical evidence, namely the size and shape of the relevant fragments and the text distribution on the...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Deutsch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
[2015]
|
| In: |
Die Welt des Orients
Jahr: 2015, Band: 45, Heft: 2, Seiten: 232-254 |
| RelBib Classification: | TC Vorchristliche Zeit ; Alter Orient |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Although certain similarities of KBo 17.2 with CTH 416 are undeniable, the theory that KBo 17.2 joins KBo 17.3+ (CTH 416.B) is problematic for a number of reasons. This study focuses first on the physical evidence, namely the size and shape of the relevant fragments and the text distribution on the tablets. Allowing for different join positions of KBo 17.2 and possible scribal lapses, potential text reconstructions are presented in order to evaluate the likelihood of a join of KBo 17.2 with KBo 17.3+. The second half of the study compares the terminology and ritual practices described in KBo 17.2 with the particular ritual to which this fragment should belong if the alleged join is correct as well as with the other rituals of CTH 416 as a whole. The possibility of a join must presently remain an open question. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2196-9019 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Die Welt des Orients
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13109/wdor.2015.45.2.232 |