On Not Seeing What Lies Open to View in Wittgenstein and Whitehead: A Response to Jerry H. Gill and Richard McDonough

In this article, I discuss two recent accounts of potential philosophical links between Whitehead and Wittgenstein, one by Jerry H. Gill (Process Studies 43.1) and a response to it by Richard McDonough (Process Studies 45.2). I argue that Gill and McDonough fail to do full justice to the views of Wh...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Ramal, Randy (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: University of Illinois Press [2017]
Dans: Process studies
Année: 2017, Volume: 46, Numéro: 1, Pages: 25-51
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1889-1951 / Whitehead, Alfred North 1861-1947 / Langage / Philosophie
RelBib Classification:TK Époque contemporaine
VA Philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Atomism
B Philosophy, Comparative
B Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951
B Whitehead, Alfred North, 1861-1947
B Peer reviewed
B Meaning (Philosophy)
B Language Philosophy
B Philosophy Définition
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:In this article, I discuss two recent accounts of potential philosophical links between Whitehead and Wittgenstein, one by Jerry H. Gill (Process Studies 43.1) and a response to it by Richard McDonough (Process Studies 45.2). I argue that Gill and McDonough fail to do full justice to the views of Whitehead and Wittgenstein on language and the nature of philosophy. I also argue that they miss an obvious link between Whitehead and Wittgenstein that would have made the engagement with their works more productive. Borrowing a metaphor from Wittgenstein, I argue that Gill and McDonough not only fail to see what is open to view regarding the views of Whitehead and Wittgenstein on language and philosophy, but also regarding their agreement on the transcendent nature of values as such.
ISSN:2154-3682
Référence:Kritik von "Language and reality (2014)"
Kritik von "Wittgenstein and Whitehead revisited (2016)"
Contient:Enthalten in: Process studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/process20174612