Who Gets to Play in the Sandbox? Debating Identities, Methodologies, and Theoretical Frameworks
Editor's introduction to the Bulletin for the Study of Religion 44.4 (2015). Specifically, this introduction presents a panel of appears responding to Caroline Schaffalitzky de Muckadell's JAAR article on essentialist definitions of religion, an Open Letter to the AAR from Kat Daley-Bailey...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Equinox
[2015]
|
In: |
Bulletin for the study of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 44, Issue: 4, Pages: 2-3 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Science of Religion
/ Theory
/ Method
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Editor's introduction to the Bulletin for the Study of Religion 44.4 (2015). Specifically, this introduction presents a panel of appears responding to Caroline Schaffalitzky de Muckadell's JAAR article on essentialist definitions of religion, an Open Letter to the AAR from Kat Daley-Bailey (and comments on the problems facing adjunct faculty with regard to the AAR annual meeting), a standalone article by Joseph Laycock on the Irving, Texas controversy Ahmed Ahmed Mohamed's homemade clock (taken as a bomb threat), an interview with the editors of the Practicum blog, and finally an Editor's Corner announcement with comment on a new subscription arrangement with NAASR. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2041-1871 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Bulletin for the study of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/bsor.v44i4.29521 |