Conceptualizing the Religious Dimensions of Armed Conflicts: A Response to Shrouded: Islam, War, and Holy War in Southeast Asia
Here I react to an article published in Volume 53 of the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion by Ian Barter and Zatkin-Osburn. My principal disagreement with Barter and Zatkin-Osburn concerns their operational and methodological critiques of my work. However, the exchange also speaks to larg...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Review |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2016]
|
| Dans: |
Journal for the scientific study of religion
Année: 2016, Volume: 55, Numéro: 1, Pages: 185-189 |
| Compte rendu de: | Shrouded (2014) (Svensson, Isak)
|
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
gam
B Islam B Compte-rendu de lecture B Aceh B quantitative measures of religion B Religious conflicts |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | Here I react to an article published in Volume 53 of the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion by Ian Barter and Zatkin-Osburn. My principal disagreement with Barter and Zatkin-Osburn concerns their operational and methodological critiques of my work. However, the exchange also speaks to larger questions of how to conceptualize and measure religious dimensions of armed conflicts. It also highlights the importance of methodological pluralism in the study of religion and conflict. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1468-5906 |
| Référence: | Kritik in "Measuring Religion in War (2016)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12251 |