Cosmic Purpose and the Question of a Personal God
Purported evidence for purposeful divine action in the cosmos may appear to warrant describing God as personal, as Swinburne proposes. In this paper, however, I argue that the primary understanding of what is meant by a person is formed by the experience of I - you or second-person relatedness,...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2013]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Jahr: 2013, Band: 5, Heft: 1, Seiten: 109-124 |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Parallele Ausgabe: | Nicht-Elektronisch
|
| Zusammenfassung: | Purported evidence for purposeful divine action in the cosmos may appear to warrant describing God as personal, as Swinburne proposes. In this paper, however, I argue that the primary understanding of what is meant by a person is formed by the experience of I - you or second-person relatedness, a mode of relation with God that is not part of natural theology. moreover, even among human beings, the recognition of purposeful agency does not invariably lead to the attribution of personhood in the usual sense. Person is therefore a misleading term to use of God on the evidence of cosmic purpose alone in the absence of suitable revelation. |
|---|---|
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v5i1.250 |