Rejoinder

Martin provides a rejoinder to the responses by Stephen Bush, Kevin Schilbrack, and Jason Blum, focusing on the theoretical difficulties following from the legacy of phenomenology of religion.

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin, Craig 1976- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2017
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 29, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 347-351
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Bush, Stephen S. 1974-, Visions of religion / Philosophia perennis / Phenomenology of religion / Religious experience / Faith
RelBib Classification:AA Study of religion
AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AG Religious life; material religion
Further subjects:B Perennialism neo-perennialism religious experience belief phenomenology of religion epiphenomenalism
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Summary:Martin provides a rejoinder to the responses by Stephen Bush, Kevin Schilbrack, and Jason Blum, focusing on the theoretical difficulties following from the legacy of phenomenology of religion.
ISSN:1570-0682
Reference:Kommentar zu "The Place of Subjectivity in the Academic Study of Religion: A Response to Craig Martin (2017)"
Kommentar zu "Religion and Belief After the Turn to Power: A Response to Craig Martin (2017)"
Kommentar zu "Comparison and the Spectre of Perennialism: A Reply to Craig Martin (2017)"
Contains:In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341395