Rejoinder
Martin provides a rejoinder to the responses by Stephen Bush, Kevin Schilbrack, and Jason Blum, focusing on the theoretical difficulties following from the legacy of phenomenology of religion.
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2017
|
| Dans: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Année: 2017, Volume: 29, Numéro: 4/5, Pages: 347-351 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Bush, Stephen S. 1974-, Visions of religion
/ Philosophia perennis
/ Phénoménologie des religions
/ Expérience religieuse
/ Foi
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AB Philosophie de la religion AG Vie religieuse |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Perennialism
neo-perennialism
religious experience
belief
phenomenology of religion
epiphenomenalism
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | Martin provides a rejoinder to the responses by Stephen Bush, Kevin Schilbrack, and Jason Blum, focusing on the theoretical difficulties following from the legacy of phenomenology of religion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Référence: | Kommentar zu "The Place of Subjectivity in the Academic Study of Religion: A Response to Craig Martin (2017)"
Kommentar zu "Religion and Belief After the Turn to Power: A Response to Craig Martin (2017)" Kommentar zu "Comparison and the Spectre of Perennialism: A Reply to Craig Martin (2017)" |
| Contient: | In: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341395 |