Moral Individualism and Relationalism: a Narrative-Style Philosophical Challenge
Morally unequal treatment of different nonhuman species, like pigs and dogs, can seem troublingly inconsistent. A position Todd May calls moral individualism and relationalism appears to justify the moral discomfit attending such species-differentiated treatment. Yet some of its basic assumptions ar...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2016]
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Jahr: 2016, Band: 19, Heft: 5, Seiten: 1241-1257 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCA Ethik NCG Ökologische Ethik; Schöpfungsethik VA Philosophie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Cora Diamond
B Relationalism B Moral consistency B Moral relevance B Raimond Gaita B Moral individualism B Todd May B Narrative philosophy B Nonhuman animals |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Morally unequal treatment of different nonhuman species, like pigs and dogs, can seem troublingly inconsistent. A position Todd May calls moral individualism and relationalism appears to justify the moral discomfit attending such species-differentiated treatment. Yet some of its basic assumptions are challenged by a philosophical style Roger Scruton called narrative philosophy. Expanding upon Christopher Cordners discussion of narrative philosophy, this paper develops a narrative-style philosophical critique of Todd Mays moral individualism and relationalism, especially its reductionist understanding of moral reasons, consistency, and relevance. Such criticism opens up the possibility that the unequal treatment of nonhuman species like pigs and dogs is perfectly consistent and even justified. However, the paper then presents a narrative-style argument that such species-differentiated treatment may be morally inconsistent and unjustified after all. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-016-9734-5 |