A Jewish Response to Gavin D'Costa, "Vatican II: Catholic Doctrines on Jews and Christians"

Responding from a Jewish perspective to Gavin D’Costa’s theology of Jews and Judaism as expressed in his book on Vatican II, I examine the implications of his rejection of some of the most important fruits of Catholic-Jewish dialogue in the past half-century. His theology leaves little space for the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Langer, Ruth 1960- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch/Druck Review
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: [publisher not identified] [2017]
In: Louvain studies
Jahr: 2017, Band: 40, Heft: 3, Seiten: 273-285
Rezension von:Vatican II (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2014) (Langer, Ruth)
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Vatikanisches Konzil 2. (1962-1965 : Vatikanstadt), Nostra aetate / Katholische Kirche / Judentum / Interreligiöser Dialog / Mission
RelBib Classification:BH Judentum
CC Christentum und nichtchristliche Religionen; interreligiöse Beziehungen
KAJ Kirchengeschichte 1914-; neueste Zeit
KDB Katholische Kirche
RJ Mission; Missionswissenschaft
weitere Schlagwörter:B Rezension
Online Zugang: Volltext (doi)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Responding from a Jewish perspective to Gavin D’Costa’s theology of Jews and Judaism as expressed in his book on Vatican II, I examine the implications of his rejection of some of the most important fruits of Catholic-Jewish dialogue in the past half-century. His theology leaves little space for the living Judaism of today and Jewish self-understanding, matters considered crucial in the Vatican’s implementation documents for Nostra Aetate 4. Consequently, he misunderstands the Jewish perception that all Christian mission, even if non-coercive, constitutes a grave existential threat. Finally, I address D’Costa’s reliance on the concept of ‘invincible ignorance’ and the unfortunate impact of employing technical terminology whose nuances one’s listeners will misunderstand. I suggest alternative framings of all these topics that would be more compatible with Jewish self-understanding.
ISSN:0024-6964
Bezug:Kritik in "A Response to the Essays (2017)"
Enthält:Enthalten in: Louvain studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2143/LS.40.3.3245492