Suffering as Ground for Religious Tolerance: An Attempt to Broaden Panikkar’s Insight on Religious Pluralism

Religions often offered themselves as answers to suffering. Not infrequently the adherents of a certain religion consider the answer of their own religion to suffering to be the best, as it is based on one’s truth-claim. Recently in South-East Asia, this kind of truth-claim can be detected also in t...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Exchange
Auteur principal: Singgih, Emanuel Gerrit (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2016
Dans: Exchange
Année: 2016, Volume: 45, Numéro: 2, Pages: 111-129
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
AX Dialogue interreligieux
BG Grandes religions
CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses
NBC Dieu
Sujets non-standardisés:B Religions Suffering Religious Commodification Religious Pluralism Pancasila Social Disasters Natural Disasters Tolerance Religious Cooperation
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:Religions often offered themselves as answers to suffering. Not infrequently the adherents of a certain religion consider the answer of their own religion to suffering to be the best, as it is based on one’s truth-claim. Recently in South-East Asia, this kind of truth-claim can be detected also in the phenomena of ‘commodification of religions’ done by various groups within Christianity, Buddhism and Islam, thus causing rivalry and intolerance. It was Paul Knitter who first describes global suffering, or ‘the pain of the world’ as religious challenge for all religions. In Indonesia, the recent social and natural disasters can be interpreted as a challenge to the established tolerance nurtured by the state ideology Pancasila, which does not question truth-claims. Panikkar’s view on religious pluralism is accepted, but only after broadening its horizon of rationality to include the people’s experience of disasters, to enable a new vision of religious tolerance.
ISSN:1572-543X
Contient:In: Exchange
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/1572543X-12341396