Response
This essay responds to the previous essays by McCutcheon, Larsson, and Jensen. It argues that, while the textbook genre is a conservative one and has a tendency to reify religion, it is important to try to move beyond such conservatism and reifications.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2017]
|
| In: |
Culture and religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Pages: 49-56 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hughes, Aaron W. 1968-, Muslim identities
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion BJ Islam |
| Further subjects: | B
Islam
B Religion B Criticism B theory and method |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This essay responds to the previous essays by McCutcheon, Larsson, and Jensen. It argues that, while the textbook genre is a conservative one and has a tendency to reify religion, it is important to try to move beyond such conservatism and reifications. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-5610 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Apologising for the study of religion - no way! (2017)"
Kritik von "Disharmony is my business and business is good - a typical day at the office of a historian of religions (2017)" Kritik von "Identifying the meaning and end of scholarship (2017)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Culture and religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14755610.2017.1301970 |