Dialectics or politics? Atheism and the return to religion
Much scholarly attention has been given to the vast differences in understandings of theism throughout the history of the theological tradition. Rather less attention has been given to differences in understandings of atheism. That there are and have been such differences, however, is obvious. This...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
[publisher not identified]
[2012]
|
| Dans: |
Approaching religion
Année: 2012, Volume: 2, Numéro: 1, Pages: 66-74 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Slavoj Žižek
B Atheism B Politics and religion B Richard Dawkins B Philosophy and religion B New Atheism B Secularism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | Much scholarly attention has been given to the vast differences in understandings of theism throughout the history of the theological tradition. Rather less attention has been given to differences in understandings of atheism. That there are and have been such differences, however, is obvious. This may be seen in the contemporary context if we juxtapose the ‘newly visible’ atheisms of, for instance, Richard Dawkins and Slavoj Žižek. In previous work, I and several other scholars have drawn attention to the ways in which the existence of different forms of atheism may be explained by the fact that they are responding to and negating very different forms of theism. But there may well be more at stake in differences between atheisms than this. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1799-3121 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Approaching religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.30664/ar.67493 |