The Hybridity of Scientific Knowledge: A Response to Leonardo Ambasciano
This article responds to Leonardo Ambasciano's review of The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800-2000 by Kocku von Stuckrad. It criticizes a narrative that presents naturalism and science as the ultimate system of knowledge. Contesting this rhetoric, the...
| Nebentitel: | Review and response: Kocku von Stuckrad's study on the scientification of religion |
|---|---|
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2016]
|
| In: |
Zygon
Jahr: 2016, Band: 51, Heft: 4, Seiten: 1067-1071 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Religion and science
B discourse research B Naturalism B Knowledge |
| Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article responds to Leonardo Ambasciano's review of The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800-2000 by Kocku von Stuckrad. It criticizes a narrative that presents naturalism and science as the ultimate system of knowledge. Contesting this rhetoric, the article underscores the plurality and hybridity of knowledge systems, which is the main topic of the book under review. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Bezug: | Kritik von "(Pseudo)Science, Religious Beliefs, and Historiography (2016)"
|
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12305 |