The Hybridity of Scientific Knowledge: A Response to Leonardo Ambasciano
This article responds to Leonardo Ambasciano's review of The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800-2000 by Kocku von Stuckrad. It criticizes a narrative that presents naturalism and science as the ultimate system of knowledge. Contesting this rhetoric, the...
| Subtitles: | Review and response: Kocku von Stuckrad's study on the scientification of religion |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2016]
|
| In: |
Zygon
Year: 2016, Volume: 51, Issue: 4, Pages: 1067-1071 |
| Further subjects: | B
Religion and science
B discourse research B Naturalism B Knowledge |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This article responds to Leonardo Ambasciano's review of The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800-2000 by Kocku von Stuckrad. It criticizes a narrative that presents naturalism and science as the ultimate system of knowledge. Contesting this rhetoric, the article underscores the plurality and hybridity of knowledge systems, which is the main topic of the book under review. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "(Pseudo)Science, Religious Beliefs, and Historiography (2016)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12305 |