The Hybridity of Scientific Knowledge: A Response to Leonardo Ambasciano

This article responds to Leonardo Ambasciano's review of The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800-2000 by Kocku von Stuckrad. It criticizes a narrative that presents naturalism and science as the ultimate system of knowledge. Contesting this rhetoric, the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Nebentitel:Review and response: Kocku von Stuckrad's study on the scientification of religion
1. VerfasserIn: Stuckrad, Kocku von 1966- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Wiley-Blackwell [2016]
In: Zygon
Jahr: 2016, Band: 51, Heft: 4, Seiten: 1067-1071
weitere Schlagwörter:B Religion and science
B discourse research
B Naturalism
B Knowledge
Online Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1555116655
003 DE-627
005 20170314132932.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170308s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/zygo.12305  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1555116655 
035 |a (DE-576)485116650 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ485116650 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)124948391  |0 (DE-627)368958809  |0 (DE-576)175432554  |4 aut  |a Stuckrad, Kocku von  |d 1966- 
109 |a Stuckrad, Kocku von 1966- 
245 1 4 |a The Hybridity of Scientific Knowledge  |b A Response to Leonardo Ambasciano  |c Kocku von Stuckrad 
246 1 |i Rubrikentitel  |a Review and response: Kocku von Stuckrad's study on the scientification of religion 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article responds to Leonardo Ambasciano's review of The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800-2000 by Kocku von Stuckrad. It criticizes a narrative that presents naturalism and science as the ultimate system of knowledge. Contesting this rhetoric, the article underscores the plurality and hybridity of knowledge systems, which is the main topic of the book under review. 
601 |a Knowledge 
650 4 |a discourse research 
650 4 |a Knowledge 
650 4 |a Naturalism 
650 4 |a Religion and science 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 51(2016), 4, Seite 1067-1071  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2016  |g number:4  |g pages:1067-1071 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Ambasciano, Leonardo  |t (Pseudo)Science, Religious Beliefs, and Historiography  |d 2016  |w (DE-627)1555115659  |w (DE-576)485115654 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/zygo.12305  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12305  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 51  |j 2016  |e 4  |h 1067-1071 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2958276716 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1555116655 
LOK |0 005 20170308160043 
LOK |0 008 170308||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Knowledge and scientific news