Reforming philosophy of religion: some methodological cautions
Kevin Schilbrack’s "Philosophy and the Study of Religion: A Manifesto" proposes to reform the traditional Philosophy of Religion by reference to three goals that it should have. In pursuit of those goals he argues for a pair of hierarchical two-stage methodologies. I argue that there are t...
| Subtitles: | Symposium on Kevin Schilbrack, Philosophy and the study of religions: a manifesto |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2016]
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 54-67 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Schilbrack, Kevin 1964-, Philosophy and the study of religions
/ Religious philosophy
/ Methodology
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | Kevin Schilbrack’s "Philosophy and the Study of Religion: A Manifesto" proposes to reform the traditional Philosophy of Religion by reference to three goals that it should have. In pursuit of those goals he argues for a pair of hierarchical two-stage methodologies. I argue that there are tensions between his defence of these methodologies and the philosophical apparatus he brings to bear in explicating the goals themselves. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0943-3058 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Towards a Philosophy of Religious Studies: A Response to Critics (2016)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341345 |