Reforming philosophy of religion: some methodological cautions
Kevin Schilbrack’s "Philosophy and the Study of Religion: A Manifesto" proposes to reform the traditional Philosophy of Religion by reference to three goals that it should have. In pursuit of those goals he argues for a pair of hierarchical two-stage methodologies. I argue that there are t...
| Nebentitel: | Symposium on Kevin Schilbrack, Philosophy and the study of religions: a manifesto |
|---|---|
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch/Druck Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
[2016]
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Jahr: 2016, Band: 28, Heft: 1, Seiten: 54-67 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Schilbrack, Kevin 1964-, Philosophy and the study of religions
/ Religionsphilosophie
/ Methodologie
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Religionswissenschaft AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Parallele Ausgabe: | Elektronisch
|
| Zusammenfassung: | Kevin Schilbrack’s "Philosophy and the Study of Religion: A Manifesto" proposes to reform the traditional Philosophy of Religion by reference to three goals that it should have. In pursuit of those goals he argues for a pair of hierarchical two-stage methodologies. I argue that there are tensions between his defence of these methodologies and the philosophical apparatus he brings to bear in explicating the goals themselves. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0943-3058 |
| Bezug: | Kritik in "Towards a Philosophy of Religious Studies: A Response to Critics (2016)"
|
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341345 |