The Middle Term: Kierkegaard and the Contemporary Debate about Explanatory Theism
Contrary to what many hold, Kierkegaard does not champion the God of classical theism. On the contrary, he criticizes the ideologies, anthropomorphisms and misleading objectifications of classical theism. He understands God not as a perfect being but as the fundamental dynamic reality of love withou...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
De Gruyter
2015
|
| In: |
Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
Jahr: 2015, Band: 20, Heft: 1, Seiten: 79-100 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus NBC Gotteslehre |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Contrary to what many hold, Kierkegaard does not champion the God of classical theism. On the contrary, he criticizes the ideologies, anthropomorphisms and misleading objectifications of classical theism. He understands God not as a perfect being but as the fundamental dynamic reality of love without which nothing else could and would exist. In his view God is not a first cause or a necessary being but the infinite or eternal actuality of creative and transforming love: a love that is self-communicating and the source of all life and love in heaven and on earth |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1612-9792 |
| Enthält: | In: Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2015-0106 |