Toleranz als mimetische Kategorie: warum Bekehrung im religiösen Dialog ein Reizwort bleibt

Tolerance as a key attitude in coping with religious and ethnical pluralisms is positively connoted. Yet »conversion«, despite of being a coherent possibility (if not necessity) of sincere dialogue and intercultural exchange, seems to trespass political correctness. A mimetical view on several pheno...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Paulin, Maximilian 1972- (Auteur)
Type de support: Imprimé Article
Langue:Allemand
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Echter 2010
Dans: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
Année: 2010, Volume: 132, Numéro: 4, Pages: 445-461
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Tolérance / Concept / Conversion / Dialogue interreligieux
RelBib Classification:AX Dialogue interreligieux
NCA Éthique
Sujets non-standardisés:B Dialogue
B World Religions
B Weltreligionen
B Tolerance
B Christianity
B Tolérance
B Christianisme
Édition parallèle:Électronique
Description
Résumé:Tolerance as a key attitude in coping with religious and ethnical pluralisms is positively connoted. Yet »conversion«, despite of being a coherent possibility (if not necessity) of sincere dialogue and intercultural exchange, seems to trespass political correctness. A mimetical view on several phenomena and aspects of tolerance points out the unuttered barriers and what conversion in a Girardian sense really means: Accepting the vanity of mimetic desire and not hating neither oneself nor any other person for that desire changes the very roots and powers of interpersonal engagement and thus lets come through a completely new foundation for tolerance.
ISSN:0044-2895
Contient:Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie