Gegner werden gemacht: neutestamentliche, religionsgeschichtliche und aktuelle Perspektiven

After the 11-9-2001 there has been a discussion about opponents, one that often uses apocalyptic terms like Antichrist. The roots of this term in 1 John present the opponent texts in a new perspective based on systems theory and constructivism. The opponents constitute a strategy of identity-making...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Schmid, Hansjörg 1972- (Auteur)
Type de support: Imprimé Article
Langue:Allemand
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Echter 2002
Dans: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
Année: 2002, Volume: 124, Numéro: 4, Pages: 385-396
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Antéchrist / Bibel. Johannesbrief 1. / 11-Septembre / Anti-islamisme
RelBib Classification:BJ Islam
CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses
HC Nouveau Testament
Sujets non-standardisés:B Zivilisationsdifferenzen / Kulturdifferenzen
B Bibel. Johannesbrief 1.-3.
B enemy image
B Islam
B Bibel. Johannesbrief 1. 2
B civilizational conflict / cultural diversity
B Le mal
B Antéchrist
B Cliché hostile
Édition parallèle:Électronique
Description
Résumé:After the 11-9-2001 there has been a discussion about opponents, one that often uses apocalyptic terms like Antichrist. The roots of this term in 1 John present the opponent texts in a new perspective based on systems theory and constructivism. The opponents constitute a strategy of identity-making by delimitation. Their pragmatic function is central, so that they are less a means to blame others. This approach is transferred to political debate, in which opponent constructions related to Islam play an important role. The perspective here is to look at those generating the opponents in the context of their world views. But are opponents and delimitations necessary at all? Moreover, as to already existing delimitations, this article asks, how to handle them responsibly. The self-referential approach cannot avoid the emergence of opponents generally, but it strengthens sensitivity in communication, so that more peaceful realities can be created. Only dialogue can break the vicious circle.
ISSN:0044-2895
Contient:Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie