Yemeni debates on the status of non-Muslims in Islamic law
This essay examines Yemeni legal debates, in the period between the fifteenth and nineteenth centuries, regarding the status of and relations with non‐Muslims inside and outside the Islamic state. The legal works considered in this paper are written by Zaydi scholars, but they are informed by all ot...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Numérique/imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
1996
|
| Dans: |
Islam and Christian-Muslim relations
Année: 1996, Volume: 7, Numéro: 2, Pages: 181-192 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Holy War
B Islam B Ère moderne B Modern Era B Guerre sacrée |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | This essay examines Yemeni legal debates, in the period between the fifteenth and nineteenth centuries, regarding the status of and relations with non‐Muslims inside and outside the Islamic state. The legal works considered in this paper are written by Zaydi scholars, but they are informed by all other Muslim legal traditions. Studies of the Islamic law of nations and of the dhimma system have traditionally fluctuated between either wholesale condemnation or unqualified apologetic defence. And yet, as the works examined in this essay illustrate, the Islamic legal position on each of the controversial aspects of the laws of non‐Muslims is diverse, and it does not lend itself to essentialist classifications. Moreover, this diversity demonstrates the internal flexibility of the law and its inherent potential for reforming itself. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0959-6410 |
| Contient: | In: Islam and Christian-Muslim relations
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/09596419608721079 |