Oppy on arguments and worldviews: an internal critique
This paper develops an internal critique of Graham Oppy’s metaphilosophy of religion – his theories of argumentation, worldview comparison, and epistemic justification. First, it presents Oppy’s views and his main reasons in their favor. Second, it argues that Oppy is committed to two claims – that...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2024
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2024, Volume: 95, Issue: 1, Pages: 61-76 |
| Further subjects: | B
Graham Oppy
B Epistemic Justification B Coherentism B Metaphilosophy B Theistic arguments |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1883284082 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240313055503.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240313s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-023-09891-0 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1883284082 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1883284082 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Békefi, Bálint |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Oppy on arguments and worldviews: an internal critique |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper develops an internal critique of Graham Oppy’s metaphilosophy of religion – his theories of argumentation, worldview comparison, and epistemic justification. First, it presents Oppy’s views and his main reasons in their favor. Second, it argues that Oppy is committed to two claims – that only truth-conducive reasons can justify philosophical belief and that such justification depends entirely on one’s judgments about the theoretical virtues of comprehensive worldviews – that jointly entail the unacceptable conclusion that philosophical beliefs cannot be justified. Third, it briefly argues that of his two claims, it is his thoroughgoing coherentism that should be rejected. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Coherentism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Epistemic Justification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Metaphilosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theistic arguments | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Graham Oppy | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 95(2024), 1, Seite 61-76 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:95 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g pages:61-76 |
| 856 | |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11153-023-09891-0.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-023-09891-0 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4499754453 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1883284082 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240313055503 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240313||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-03-12#CCD4AFA9786B416BA42D9DC5469D8C7FE2C261F9 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||