Social Cohesion and Religiosity – Empirical Results from an Online Survey in Germany during the COVID-19 Pandemic
The empirical results for Germany show that the people surveyed in the period from July 2020 to January 2021 tended to hold together more. Several cohesion dimensions, particularly institutional trust and national identification, strengthened. In contrast, social trust weakened. The role of religios...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill, Schöningh
2023
|
| In: |
Religion & development
Jahr: 2023, Band: 2, Heft: 2, Seiten: 213-260 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Covid-19
B Social Cohesion B Pandemic B Religiosity B online survey B Germany |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 187634993X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231219055506.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231219s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.30965/27507955-20230003 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)187634993X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP187634993X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hillenbrand, Carolin |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Social Cohesion and Religiosity – Empirical Results from an Online Survey in Germany during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The empirical results for Germany show that the people surveyed in the period from July 2020 to January 2021 tended to hold together more. Several cohesion dimensions, particularly institutional trust and national identification, strengthened. In contrast, social trust weakened. The role of religiosity is ambivalent. It is not the intensity but the content and practices of faith that make the difference. Exclusivist religious beliefs, a punitive image of God, and private prayer practice are negatively related, while a loving image of God and service attendance are positively related to social cohesion. | ||
| 520 | |a These questions are answered within a theory-led empirical analysis. Social cohesion is conceptualized as a multidimensional construct that manifests itself in horizontal (citizen–citizen) and vertical (citizen–state) relationships. It is measured by eight subdimensions: social/institutional trust, social inclusive/national identification, social/institutional responsibility, and social/political engagement. Religiosity is specified with three dimensions: belonging (religious affiliation), believing (faith intensity/content), and behaving (prayer/service attendance). | ||
| 520 | |a Social scientists and development practitioners are increasingly recognizing the significance of social cohesion as a prerequisite for and part of sustainable development. At the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic poses severe challenges to the cohesion of societies. However, the specific role of people’s religiosity in their attitudes and behaviors relevant for social cohesion has rarely been empirically-quantitatively investigated. | ||
| 520 | |a Using primary data from an online survey in Germany, this article addresses three research questions: 1) How can the construct “social cohesion” be empirically and quantitatively measured? 2) What dynamics of social cohesion were evident in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic (in 2020/2021)? 3) What specific role did people’s religiosity play in social cohesion in that context? | ||
| 601 | |a Germanien | ||
| 601 | |a COVID-19 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a online survey | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pandemic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Covid-19 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Germany | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religiosity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social Cohesion | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religion & development |d Paderborn, Germany : Brill, Schöningh, 2021 |g 2(2023), 2, Seite 213-260 |w (DE-627)1789474957 |w (DE-600)3109650-5 |x 2750-7955 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:2023 |g number:2 |g pages:213-260 |
| 856 | |u https://brill.com/downloadpdf/view/journals/rnd/2/2/article-p213_4.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.30965/27507955-20230003 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/rnd/2/2/article-p213_4.xml |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 2 |j 2023 |e 2 |h 213-260 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4440641296 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 187634993X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20231219055506 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 231219||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-12-18#7AF81B77B25D9462C2CCBCE6E347F9A58E46FB64 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||