The Intersectional Logic of "Bad Religion": Complex Intersections of Religion and other Classificatory Concepts in German Development Cooperation

Using an example of German Christian development cooperation, this paper examines strengths and weaknesses of an intersectional analysis in relation to "religion." I will make a twofold argument. First, I will argue that the rhetoric of "bad religion" present in development coope...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Geiger, Leonie Charlotta 1992- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Equinox 2022
In: Implicit religion
Jahr: 2022, Band: 25, Heft: 1/2, Seiten: 153-174
weitere Schlagwörter:B development cooperation
B Religion
B critical study of religion
B Assemblage
B Gender
B Intersectionality
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Using an example of German Christian development cooperation, this paper examines strengths and weaknesses of an intersectional analysis in relation to "religion." I will make a twofold argument. First, I will argue that the rhetoric of "bad religion" present in development cooperation is based on an intersectional logic and reproduces marginalization. Second, I will present that intersectional approaches often conceptualize "religion" in an essentialist way. By doing so, I will explore the common features of "development" and "intersectionality," referred to here as the intersectional logic of development, describe the role of "religion" within it and demonstrate a dualistic logic of reading positions as hegemonic and non-hegemonic within this intersectional logic of development. Drawing on the concept of assemblage developed by Jasbir Puar (2007), this essay concludes by proposing some programmatic considerations that allow addressing these challenges and further developing intersectional studies as well as the critical study of religion.
ISSN:1743-1697
Enthält:Enthalten in: Implicit religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1558/imre.23812