APA (7th ed.) Citation

Choo, F. (2023). Conversational implicatures cannot save divine command theory from the counterpossible terrible commands objection. Religious studies, 59(4), 852-858. doi:10.1017/S0034412522000440

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Choo, Frederick. "Conversational Implicatures Cannot Save Divine Command Theory from the Counterpossible Terrible Commands Objection." Religious Studies 59, no. 4 (2023): 852-858, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000440.

MLA (8th ed.) Citation

Choo, Frederick. "Conversational Implicatures Cannot Save Divine Command Theory from the Counterpossible Terrible Commands Objection." Religious Studies, vol. 59, no. 4, 2023, pp. 852-858, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000440.