Did Mīrdāmād believe in the primacy of quiddity?
Some scholars showed that Mīrdāmād believed in the ‘primacy of quiddity’ by adducing his theory of ‘the simple act of creation’ in which an entity’s quiddity is the ‘object‘ of the act of creation, and by adducing his belief that ‘existence‘ is constructed. Some other passages in Mīrdāmād’s work rei...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Carfax
2023
|
| In: |
Asian philosophy
Year: 2023, Volume: 33, Issue: 4, Pages: 299-315 |
| Further subjects: | B
simple act of creation (al-jaʿl al-basīṭ)
B existence (wujūd) B Quiddity (māhiyya) B Mīrdāmād |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1869085671 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231103055506.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231103s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/09552367.2023.2225962 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1869085671 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1869085671 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Khademi, Hamid Reza |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Did Mīrdāmād believe in the primacy of quiddity? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Some scholars showed that Mīrdāmād believed in the ‘primacy of quiddity’ by adducing his theory of ‘the simple act of creation’ in which an entity’s quiddity is the ‘object‘ of the act of creation, and by adducing his belief that ‘existence‘ is constructed. Some other passages in Mīrdāmād’s work reinforce such attribution, made by his prominent student, Mullā Ṣadrā and his followers. This article offers a careful account of Mīrdāmād’s theory of ‘simple act of creation’ to assess the accuracy or inaccuracy of this attribution, and to provide a precise picture of quiddity in his philosophical system. The authors concluded that Mīrdāmād’s idea about ‘quiddity’ as the ‘object’ of creation by no means implies the primacy of quiddity as understood by Mullā Ṣadrā.By explicating his theory of ‘the simple act of creation’, they showed that it does’ imply the primacy of quiddity. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Mīrdāmād | |
| 650 | 4 | |a simple act of creation (al-jaʿl al-basīṭ) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a existence (wujūd) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quiddity (māhiyya) | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hesari, Reza |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Asian philosophy |d London [u.a.] : Carfax, 1991 |g 33(2023), 4, Seite 299-315 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320310922 |w (DE-600)2025427-1 |w (DE-576)094080704 |x 1469-2961 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g pages:299-315 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2023.2225962 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 33 |j 2023 |e 4 |h 299-315 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4401165446 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1869085671 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20231103055506 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 231103||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-11-02#250556000663297427B248F8AAD704C5DC110A0D | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||