Regulating Sincerity: Religion, Law, Public Policy, and the Ambivalence of Religious Freedom in Pluralist Societies

This chapter analyzes the interlocking systems of power between the "judicialization of religious freedom" and the regulation of sincerity of belief to argue that an autonomous judicial system is crucial for maintaining religious freedom for niqab-wearing Muslim women. I critically examine...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alibhai, Zaheeda P: (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2021
In: Annual review of the sociology of religion
Year: 2021, Volume: 12, Pages: 105-122
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1865699896
003 DE-627
005 20231016084814.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231016s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/9789004468085_007  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1865699896 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1865699896 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Alibhai, Zaheeda P:  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Regulating Sincerity  |b Religion, Law, Public Policy, and the Ambivalence of Religious Freedom in Pluralist Societies 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This chapter analyzes the interlocking systems of power between the "judicialization of religious freedom" and the regulation of sincerity of belief to argue that an autonomous judicial system is crucial for maintaining religious freedom for niqab-wearing Muslim women. I critically examine three legal studies to explore how sociological understandings of lived religion as practice can conflict with state and legal definitions over what constitutes "religious freedom." I conclude by arguing that the judicialization of religious freedom has become instrumental for niqab-wearing Muslim women’s legal claims, access to the rights and privileges associated with citizenship and visibility in public space, while at the same time blurring the boundaries of lived religion and practice. 
601 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Annual review of the sociology of religion  |d Leiden : Brill, 2010  |g 12(2021), Seite 105-122  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1028077963  |w (DE-600)2936913-7  |w (DE-576)507874315  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2021  |g pages:105-122 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/display/book/9789004468085/BP000008.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004468085_007  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 12  |j 2021  |h 105-122 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4389685600 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1865699896 
LOK |0 005 20231016084814 
LOK |0 008 231016||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL