The Double-Mirror Gaze, Transcoded Testimony, and Disqualified Witnesses in the Talmud
I will argue that the underlying rationale for the talmudic list of trades disqualified from legal testimony is aesthetic. These trades involved professional mimicry, which as such incapacitated what R. Neis has termed “homovisuality” or self-referential witnessing in the Talmud. Reading talmudic la...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
2023
|
Dans: |
The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
Année: 2023, Volume: 31, Numéro: 2, Pages: 127-162 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Blanchot
B Play B Gambling B Greco-Roman philosophy B Deleuze B mise en abyme B Gadamer B Mimésis B Talmud |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | I will argue that the underlying rationale for the talmudic list of trades disqualified from legal testimony is aesthetic. These trades involved professional mimicry, which as such incapacitated what R. Neis has termed “homovisuality” or self-referential witnessing in the Talmud. Reading talmudic laws of conjoined testimony and the induction of witnesses in light of Deleuze’s and Blanchot’s philosophy, I will argue that homovisuality entailed the witness’s reincarnation as the subject of the event, thus re-signifying rather than reporting the event. The judge, transformed into a witness, could capture the truth of the event at a glance, in a manner both prior to and irreducible to trial procedures. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1477-285X |
Contient: | Enthalten in: The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/1477285x-12341348 |