Social entrepreneur perceived success by integrating cognitive mapping and MCDA

The dual nature of social enterprises (social and financial goals) brings crucial challenges regarding the tensions to which objectives address, and therefore success is harder to assess and attain. This study aims to respond to this gap of knowledge by investigating social enterprises perceived pat...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Autres titres:"The Economy of Francesco: Ongoing Perspectives for a New Economy"
Auteurs: Carvalho, Ema (Auteur) ; Bicho, Marta (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: International Association of Management, Spirituality & Religion 2023
Dans: Journal of management, spirituality & religion
Année: 2023, Volume: 20, Numéro: 4, Pages: 406-432
RelBib Classification:NCC Éthique sociale
NCE Éthique des affaires
ZA Sciences sociales
Sujets non-standardisés:B Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
B Subjective Perceived Success
B Social Enterprises
B Social Entrepreneur
B Aufsatz in Zeitschrift
B Cognitive Mapping
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:The dual nature of social enterprises (social and financial goals) brings crucial challenges regarding the tensions to which objectives address, and therefore success is harder to assess and attain. This study aims to respond to this gap of knowledge by investigating social enterprises perceived path to success. It gives voice to social entrepreneur's notion of success and applies the combination of Cognitive Mapping and MACBETH, techniques that help to capture success criteria's complexity. The outcome of this study is a framework that allows to understand the way social entrepreneurs perceive success for their social enterprises. The findings reveal five indicators, in which the most important is Financial Sustainability, followed by Social Impact, whereas Business Model is considered the least important factor.
ISSN:1942-258X
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of management, spirituality & religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.51327/KJOF5806