‘The Christic Models’: African Pentecostalism, Hegemonic Messianisms, and the Two-Natures Messianicity
The task of this article is to interrogate and reconstruct Fabien Eboussi Boulaga’s theory of the Christic model as a pragmatic response to negative messianisms among African Pentecostals. Taking the hint from the two-natures messianic metaphoricity, the article argues that the messianic structure o...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
2023
|
Dans: |
Journal of pentecostal theology
Année: 2023, Volume: 32, Numéro: 2, Pages: 290-307 |
RelBib Classification: | KAJ Époque contemporaine KBN Afrique subsaharienne KDG Église libre NBF Christologie VA Philosophie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
African Pentecostalism
B Fabien Eboussi Boulaga B Christic model B hegemonic messianisms B two-natures messianicity B eternal myth |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | The task of this article is to interrogate and reconstruct Fabien Eboussi Boulaga’s theory of the Christic model as a pragmatic response to negative messianisms among African Pentecostals. Taking the hint from the two-natures messianic metaphoricity, the article argues that the messianic structure of Christ as an eternal myth is infinitely culturally demythologized into different historical and cultural contexts. It concludes by demonstrating that the two-natures messianicity captures a dialectic connection between divine infinity and human finitude. A pragmatic reconceptualization of the two-natures messianicity serves as a structuring principle or functional messianic model in the search for a balance of power and accountability in the struggle against menacing dominant hegemonies. It is critical because African Pentecostalism functions with the power-over as a structuring principle which makes congregants vulnerable to abuse of spiritual power and objectification, sexualization, and exploitation of a mystified mass. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5251 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of pentecostal theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455251-32010010 |