Subject Peoples and Civilizational Priority: Competition among Babylonians, Egyptians, and Judeans in the Hellenistic Era

This article proceeds on the principle that we need to decenter dominant ethnic groups—primarily Greeks and Greco-Macedonians in the early Hellenistic era—in order to understand other marginalized viewpoints and experiences, including but not limited to those of Judeans (Jews). An analysis of the Ba...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Harland, Philip A. 1969- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Cambridge Univ. Press 2023
In: Harvard theological review
Jahr: 2023, Band: 116, Heft: 3, Seiten: 317-339
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Berossos, von Babylon ca. 345 v. Chr.-270 v. Chr. / Manetho, Aegyptius ca. 3 v. Chr.. Jh. / Artapanus, Iudaeus 2 v. Chr.. Jh. / Babylonien / Ägypten (Altertum) / Juden / Zivilisation / Vorrang
RelBib Classification:HB Altes Testament
HD Frühjudentum
KBL Naher Osten; Nordafrika
TC Vorchristliche Zeit ; Alter Orient
weitere Schlagwörter:B subject peoples
B ethnic rivalries
B Babylonians
B Colonialism
B Egyptians
B ethnicity in the ancient world
B Judeans
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article proceeds on the principle that we need to decenter dominant ethnic groups—primarily Greeks and Greco-Macedonians in the early Hellenistic era—in order to understand other marginalized viewpoints and experiences, including but not limited to those of Judeans (Jews). An analysis of the Babylonian author Bel-re’ushu helps to provide a new angle on Judean (e.g., Artapanus) and Egyptian (e.g., Manetho) participation within ethnic discourses that include claims to civilizational priority. I would suggest that the rhetoric of ethnic superiority in writings by subject peoples can be viewed as a symptom of ethnic interactions and not merely as a literary response to elite Greek claims regarding the inferiority of supposedly "barbarian" peoples. So it is not always the currently hegemonic Greeks that are the principal interlocutors in these ethnic discourses.
ISSN:1475-4517
Enthält:Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0017816023000184