Atheists, Agnostics, Skeptics, and the Unconcerned: Why the European Court is Inconsistent in its Case Law and Violates Article 9 ECHR

In 1993 (Kokkinakis v. Greece), the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg ruled that under Article 9, "atheists, agnostics, skeptics, and the unconcerned" are protected; but to make that protection effective, the Court requires those views to meet the requirements of "cogency,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cliteur, Paul (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Creighton University 2023
In: The journal of religion & society
Year: 2023, Volume: 25, Pages: 1-16
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1851332200
003 DE-627
005 20240521165144.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230630s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10504/140343  |2 hdl 
035 |a (DE-627)1851332200 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1851332200 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Cliteur, Paul  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Atheists, Agnostics, Skeptics, and the Unconcerned  |b Why the European Court is Inconsistent in its Case Law and Violates Article 9 ECHR 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In 1993 (Kokkinakis v. Greece), the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg ruled that under Article 9, "atheists, agnostics, skeptics, and the unconcerned" are protected; but to make that protection effective, the Court requires those views to meet the requirements of "cogency, seriousness, cohesion, and importance." In 2021 (De Wilde v. the Netherlands), the Court ruled that the pastafarians (adherents to the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster) failed to meet these requirements. This article analyzes the two verdicts, pointing out the relevance for the protection of religious and non-religious minorities. 
601 |a Case law 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of religion & society  |d Omaha, Nev. : Creighton University, 1999  |g 25(2023), Seite 1-16  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)349876045  |w (DE-600)2081561-X  |w (DE-576)281212546  |x 1522-5658  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:2023  |g pages:1-16 
856 4 0 |u https://cdr.creighton.edu/handle/10504/140343  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://hdl.handle.net/10504/140343  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4344926439 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1851332200 
LOK |0 005 20230630111439 
LOK |0 008 230630||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL